News

Panel on Racial and Social Profiling Available Online

Grimposium and Project SOMEONE collaborated with Heavy Montréal to bring grindcore legends Pig Destroyer to Théâtre Corona on July 26, 2019. Landscape Of Hate opened the show that also featured a youth workshop and a panel on racial and social profiling moderated by Annabelle Brault, music therapist professor at Concordia University and Landscape of Hate collaborator, with the participation of Vivek Venkatesh, UNESCO co-Chair in Prevention of Radicalisation and Violent Extremism, Director, Centre for the Study of Learning and Performance, Associate Professor, Inclusive Practices in Visual Arts, Art Education at Concordia University, Director, Project SOMEONE and co-founder of Landscape of Hate and Landscape of Hope; Elsa F. Mondésir Villefort, Project Manager involved in public education on human rights and the promotion of international solidarity among youth, and member of the Youth Advisory Group of the Canadian Commission for UNESCO;  JR Hayes, Pig Destroyer lyricist and singer and Will Prosper, documentary filmmaker, civil rights activist, former RCMP officer, co-founder of Montréal-Nord Républik, a citizens’ movement against police brutality, and co-founder of Montreal Hoodstock Social Forum. To view the full video of the panel, click here.

New Landscape of Hate Performance Available Online

 

Grimposium and Project SOMEONE collaborated with Heavy Montreal to bring grindcore legends Pig Destroyer to Théâtre Corona on July 26, 2019. Electronic improvisation outfit Landscape of Hate, featuring Co-founders Vivek Venkatesh and Owen Chapman, with collaborators Annabelle Brault, Jason Wallin, David Hall and anabasine, opened the show. The event also featured a youth workshop and a panel on racial and social profiling. 

 

 

New Database to Inform Online Hate Speech

Project SOMEONE is pleased to announce the launch of the Words in Context Database.  The project uses Corpus-Assisted Critical Discourse Analysis (CACDA) to critically analyze recent hate discourse on popular online spaces such as YouTube, Twitter, Facebook and Reddit.

The focus of the project is on the Lebanese and Canadian contexts and aims to inform and shape public policy on these issues of extremism, misogyny and gender-based violence. Government and community leaders, researchers and practitioners can access this valuable tool to detect patterns and trends of online hate.

The database website is easily navigable by keyword or theme (each of which also includes an accompanying policy brief) and the raw data is also available for download.

The project was developed by Vivek Venkatesh, Kathryn Urbaniak, Manasvini Narayana, Ryan Scrivens, Rawda Harb, Racha Cheikh-Ibrahim, Tieja Thomas and Simon Rodier. It was funded by Global Affairs Canada as part of a larger project including the “Hate to Hope” MOOC, as well as specialized workshops in Lebanon.

To learn more please visit the website

New Infographics Tool to Combat Racial and Social Profiling

 

Project SOMEONE is currently collaborating with the Canadian Commission for UNESCO on a project to develop infographics, as part of a tool kit that will help inform issues surrounding racial and social profiling in marginalized communities.

We aim to create multimedia stories with these communities to represent diverse experiences, as well as co-create pluralistic dialogue spaces with key stakeholders from various sectors of society.

With this in mind, we are currently organizing a unique event: a public panel on racial profiling and youth workshop, followed by a show by Landscape of Hate and Pig Destroyer on July 26 at the Corona Theater. The data from these interventions will contribute to this toolbox.

This project was developed by Léah Snider, Emma Haraké, Kathryn Urbaniak, Manasvini Narayana and Vivek Venkatesh.

EN – Silent LANDSCAPE_Jun17_2019

The “Self” and the “Other”: A Theoretical Approach

By Dan Mamlok and Sandra Chang-Kredl

In our previous post, we introduced our research concerning children’s construction of the self and the other. Here, we will describe our theoretical approach to the ideas of the self and the other, based on the theory of George Herbert Mead (1956).  

A key concept in our research is the other. We routinely use this term to refer to people who are different from the majority, or from what cultural groups consider “normal.” In sociology, “other” refers to the ways in which identities are formed. Understanding identity formation requires us to look at power relationships and the assumptions about different groups within society, in other words, social categories. This is important because when individuals internalize their social identities, they develop a worldview regarding the self and the other.

One of the most influential developments of the ideas of the self and the other (and othering) in modern sociology was developed by George Herbert Mead, who devised the idea of the generalized other. This concept refers to the organization of behavior, attitudes, responses, roles, and acts that the self considers as a social being. In other words, this term represents how children and adults understand themselves in relation to society. Mead talks about how gestures and symbols can determine the way in which we act in different situations (workplace, school, cultural events). For instance, when a teacher enters the classroom, the students know they’re expected to be quiet, or to start working on an assignment, or a group project. The concept of the generalized other is related to Mead’s broader accounts on the development of the self. According to Mead, the self isn’t isolated from social and cultural contexts. Rather, people develop their identity when they start interacting with others and become aware of the different roles they play. In childhood, we can see how children do this through pretend play. While in the first stages of symbolic play, children tend to adopt roles (such as a mother, a dog). In the more advanced stages of development (i.e. sociodramatic play), children understand the complex nexus of the different roles that other participants acquire in play, which according to Mead, is an important element of realizing how social systems operate.

The idea of the generalized other is helpful when observing young children’s development of identity and understanding of the self and the other. It’s also essential when considering how social systems and processes of socialization evolve, and how people internalize values and assumptions about their and other communities. This theory also explains how conformity emerges, and the importance of community values in terms of one’s identity development. An important element in Mead’s account of the self is one’s ability to move beyond the recognition of one’s self as part of the system, and to develop a reflexive attitude. Namely, the ability to recognize the self in a way that transcends one’s specific characters (such as mom, dad, siblings, friends) and to position the self in relation to generalized other[s]— the representation becomes more abstract than concrete, and it is placed within social and cultural context. This is essential for the development of society, and for individuals to make positive and constructive changes in their communities.

With respect to our research, we aim to understand how cultural artifacts (including online and offline materials) influence the development of children’s identities, how they conceive of themselves in relation to society, what aspects reflect a broader cultural understanding of the community/self-identity, and the implications our findings may have for teachers and parents of young children. Furthermore, the sociological elements of identity development are key to understanding how social identities and conventions are formed, thus helping us to develop pedagogical tools to advance a more reflective understanding of social situations.    

The Christchurch Call: A Commendable, but Difficult Initiative.

 

By Maxime Bérubé, SSHRC Postdoctoral Fellow, SOMEONE Project and UNESCO-PREV Chair

Since the beginning of the 21st century, most societies and extremist movements worldwide have invested in digital spaces. Some extremists take advantage of the democratization of the Internet and the advent of social networks to promote terrorist organizations and violence. To undermine their efforts, a growing number of state leaders and technology companies are joining a recent initiative known as the “Christchurch Call.” This initiative, launched by the French and New Zealand governments, proposes the use of global means to combat the promotion and incitement to hatred and violence in the digital context. As laudable as this approach may be, it does, however, offer many legal, ethical and technical challenges.

Legal Inconsistencies

Although many States have significantly strengthened their legislative framework to combat violent extremism in recent years, adjustments to this effect vary from country to country and aren’t applied uniformly. In Canada, unlike France for example, a judge must agree with the deletion of digital content deemed illegal. As the issues related to the dissemination of this online material transcend borders, it becomes necessary to maintain consistency regarding legislative frameworks. Thus, allowing for a uniform application of the established procedures. In the same vein, standardization must also be applied to the conditions of use for the different platforms where the problematic content is distributed. Otherwise, its diffusion and practices might possibly adapt, resulting in a partial and fragmented solution. Additionally, the United States, an essential player in this fight, hasn’t joined the call.

Ethical and Technical Limits

If global measures can be applied to quickly or instantly remove undesirable content from the digital realm, certain technological limits are important to consider. Firstly, collaboration with countless players in the web industry is essential, as only they can control the activities related to their platforms. Although the main and wealthiest web “giants” seem to have followed suit, technology companies with insufficient resources for this purpose, and who are also popular with violent extremist movements, will still require incentives. Also, current technologies prevent immediate deletion. Content is usually removed within 24 hours or less, but often after numerous users have consulted it. Inevitably, logistical and technical delays influence such practices because deletion by computerized systems still requires human supervision to avoid the removal of content that shouldn’t be censored, thus respecting freedom of expression. In recent years, several thousand web pages and social media accounts have been shut down or closed. While this may reduce the quantity and scope of extremist content or terrorist propaganda in the digital realm, the very nature of the Internet makes it highly unlikely that we can hope to remove all controversial content.

Finally, without wanting to sound pessimistic, this call would appear to be facing significant obstacles that require great thought. This repressive approach also lacks unanimity because of the limitations outlined above. To remedy this situation—without undermining the principles of freedom of expression—a more educational approach would be advantageous. Rather than trying to eliminate content from the digital realm or quickly censoring statements, redirecting this initiative towards a globalized strategy of social education—focused primarily on the development of critical thinking and digital literacy—would provide concrete long-term results, and widespread societal benefits.

Landscape of Hate and Pig Destroyer Event- Montreal 2019

Grimposium, Project Someone and their long-standing partner Heavy Montreal are proud to announce the return of grindcore legends Pig Destroyer to Montreal on Friday, July 26, 2019. This powerful and intimate event will open with local electronic improv outfit, Landscape of Hate, run by Project Someone director Vivek Venkatesh and his colleague Owen Chapman of Concordia University. Performing in Landscape of Hate will be Vivek Venkatesh, anabasine, Jason Wallin, and Annabelle Brault. Visuals by David Hall. Music composed by Vivek Venkatesh, Owen Chapman, and anabasine.

This event will also offer creative workshops with both bands and a panel discussion on racial and social profiling featuring local activists, youth and community leaders. Workshops and panel session are free to the public. The full schedule of activities will be announced in mid-July on Grimposium.com

Tickets for this unique event are on sale shortly here

Posters of Misappropriated Runic Symbols Going to Auction to Fight Discrimination

In September 2017, Grimposium and Enslaved teamed up in Québec City, Canada for the one-off NordiQC festival—a celebration of Bergen-based music, culture, tattoo and visual art. As part of the public engagement activities at NordiQC, Grimposium founder Vivek Venkatesh and Enslaved founders Ivar Bjørnson and Kjetil Grutle teamed up with Québec-based visual artist Filip Ivanović to create a video reclaiming runic narratives from right-wing extremists. Bjørnson and Grutle drew out 24 Runic symbols on Ivanović’s NordiQC posters, explained the meaning of each of these, and talked about how they were being misappropriated by extremist groups to promote racist ideals.

Now, in July of 2019, Grimposium and Enslaved are proud to collaborate with Eistnaflug to auction these unique posters—which have been signed by all the members of Enslaved—during the festival itself! Proceeds from the auction will be donated to local Icelandic initiatives that promote community resilience to discrimination.

New Policy Briefs Targeting Canadian Social Issues

As part of our work with the Canada Centre for Community Engagement and Prevention of Violence’s Community Resilience Fund (CRF), Project Someone is proud to announce the completion of a series of policy briefs that target a number of contemporary social issues with a potential for radicalization and violence in Canada.

The five policy briefs (available in English only) were developed by Tieja Thomas, Jennifer Faucher, Jennifer Morrow, and Peter Dimitrakopoulos. These summarize the findings from our CACDA (Corpus Assisted Critical Discourse Analysis) of specific online conversations in Canada surrounding themes of Islamophobia, misogyny towards female parliamentarians, the Far Right, multiculturalism, and missing and murdered indigenous women and girls. Each brief contains a summary, methodology, discussion and reference, as well as suggested readings.

To read more about the project please click here.

To view and download the briefs, please click below:

Indigenous Relations in Canada

Islamophobia in Canada

Multiculturalism in Canada

Online Misogyny in Canadian Politics

The Far-Right in Canada

 

New Project Examines How Children Construct Narratives of Self and Other


By Dan Mamlok and Sandra Chang-Kredl

How do children experience offline and online activities and what do these entail? How do children understand themselves in relation to the media they use? How do parents perceive their children’s experiences? What are some common narratives children learn through offline and online activities, and how might these narratives influence their identities and their understanding of the other? These are some questions we are currently studying.

In recent years, Project Someone has explored various aspects of online hate speech and violent extremism. The initiative has developed 11 projects that aim to advance critical thinking, social pedagogy, and curricular plans for preventing hate speech. Considering the growing participation of children (including young children) in digital media, this study expands the initiative to examine how children 12 and under—typically the cut-off age for social media platforms such as Facebook and Instagram—are initiated and subsumed within a culture of popular texts, including games, TV shows, video games, YouTube videos, books, and cultural artifacts.

This research project is comprised of theoretical and empirical research. The theoretical segment on the construction of children’s identity is based on sociological and psychological theories. In brief, we are looking at how children develop their social identities, and how they internalize certain social categories, such as gender, race and class. Understanding how children perceive and internalize these concepts is crucial for recognizing the ways in which children will ultimately develop their understanding of the other. This will, in turn, help us to develop pedagogical approaches to work with children of different ages, through recognizing cultural artifacts as social texts, thus advancing a more critical worldview.

The qualitative study is based on play observations and discussions with children between the ages of 4 and 11, and interviews with their parents. In congruence with the theoretical framework, the purpose of the qualitative research study is to investigate the processes through which children’s identities are influenced by the cultural artifacts they use and to which they are exposed. Currently, we are working on data collection through child-led play sessions with the young participants and interviews with their parents in their home environments. This will allow us to deepen our understanding of how children’s interactions with social texts can influence their construction of self and other, and create strategies for developing critical thinking and agency among this population.

In our next posts, we will elaborate on the theoretical framework and share some initial findings from our qualitative research study.